Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Disability Policy Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stapleton, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Federal Program Expenditures for Working-Age People With Disabilities

Nanette J. Goodman

Institute for Policy Research, Cornell University, ng54{at}cornell.edu

David C. Stapleton

Institute for Policy Research, Cornell University

The authors estimated that the federal government spent $226 billion in 2002 on working-age people with disabilities, including both cash and in-kind benefits. These expenditures accounted for about 2.2% of the nation's gross domestic product and 11.3% of all federal outlays. States contributed an additional $50 billion under federal—state programs. The bulk of these expenditures provided income support and health care to working-age people with disabilities who were not employed or who had very low earnings. They provide a detailed accounting of the expenditures and question whether the distribution of expenditures is properly aligned with the evolving disability paradigm.

Journal of Disability Policy Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, 66-78 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/10442073070180020301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Disability Policy StudiesHome page
D. C. Stapleton, R. V. Burkhauser, Peiyun She, R. R. Weathers II, and G. A. Livermore
Income Security for Workers: A Stressed Support System in Need of Innovation
Journal of Disability Policy Studies, March 1, 2009; 19(4): 204 - 220.
[Abstract] [PDF]