Journal of Disability Policy Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finlayson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hammel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Finlayson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hammel, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Disability Policy Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, 109-119 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/10442073030140020901
© 2003 Hammill Institute on Disabilities

Providing Alternative Financing for Assistive Technology

Outcomes Over Twenty Months

Marcia Finlayson

University of Illinois at Chicago, marciaf{at}uic.edu

Joy Hammel

University of Illinois at Chicago

This article presents the findings from data collected between October 1, 2000, and June 12, 2002, through a Web-based outcome data collection and management system designed for use by alternative financing programs (AFPs) for assistive technology that are supported by a grant from the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research. The findings suggest that funding for mobility equipment (including adapted transportation) is the most sought by applicants to AFPs. Although the majority of the applicants were receiving funding, women, people living in urban areas, and individuals in the lowest income quartile (less than $966/month) were less likely to be approved for a loan. Overall, the findings suggest that the AFPs are providing an avenue for people with disabilities to acquire assistive technology they have been unable to access through other funding sources. Areas for future development of the AFPs are identified, including outreach to minority and non—English-speaking groups.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?