Journal of Disability Policy Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheets, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sheets, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, M. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Disability Policy Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, 243-252 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/104420730201200404
© 2002 Hammill Institute on Disabilities

State Rehabilitation Agencies, Aging with Disability, and Technology

Policy Issues and Implications

Debra J. Sheets

California State University-Northridge

Phoebe S. Liebig

University of Southern California

Margaret L. Campbell

National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research

Recent federal and state laws have required state rehabilitation programs and Tech Act programs (TAPs) to improve the access of persons with disabilities to assistive technology (AT) and home modifications (HM). A national survey of all 81 state rehabilitation programs, conducted in 1997 and 1998, examined the extent to which state rehabilitation agencies provided services to middle age (51 years-64 years) and older (65 years and older) clients, agency staff awareness of the aging of the disability population, and agency capacity to provide access to AT/HM for persons with disabilities who are older. Findings indicated that agencies for the blind or visually impaired (BVIs) served significantly more middle age and older persons, were more aware of aging, and provided greater access to AT/HM than did rehabilitation agencies (RAs). In addition, RAs having TAPs within their agency were more aware of aging, provided more staff training on aging, and collected more data on middle age and older clients than did RAs without TAPs. These results point to the need for more counselor training in the areas of technology and aging, areas in which the TAPs and the network of agencies dealing with aging issues can play a major role. To meet the challenges of an aging population, rehabilitation agencies may also need a mandate that makes independent living a valued outcome in and of itself. Finally, agencies need more AT/HM funding so they can address the growing population of middle age and older persons with disabilities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?