This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reeves, W. C. Articles by Unger, E. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Response to Jason et al. (2009), "Evaluating the Centers for Disease Control’s Empirical Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Case Definition"

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wcr1{at}cdc.gov.

	Abstract

The recent article by Jason, Najar, Porter, and Reh, "Evaluating the Centers for Disease Control's Empirical Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Case Definition" (2009; Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20:2, 93–100) attempted to critically explore several pertinent issues concerning diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Most of these issues have been brewing since international adoption of the 1994 CFS case definition by Fukuda et al., and it is high time to address them in a peerreviewed and public forum.

First published on September 25, 2009
Journal of Disability Policy Studies 2009, doi:10.1177/1044207309346310


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?