This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Innes, B. Articles by Arnold, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Assessing the Geographic Distribution of Centers for Independent Living Across Urban and Rural Areas

Toward a Policy of Universal Access

The University of Montana

Alexandra Enders

The University of Montana

Tom Seekins

The University of Montana

Dustin J. Merritt

The University of Montana

Ari Kirshenbaum

The University of Montana

Nancy Arnold

The University of Montana

Centers for Independent Living (CILs) have emerged as a significant source of services, supports, and advocacy for people with disabilities in the United States. Since 1978, the federal government has funded an increasing number of CILs around the nation to provide services to and advocate for people with disabilities. Others have been created with state and local funding. No data have been collected to assess the extent of CIL expansion, however. We identified 336 CILs and estimated that these centers operate 253 subordinate sites. We conducted a survey of a random sample of 62 CILs to assess the geographic areas they served and the extent of their service. Results suggested that CIL services are provided to more than 212,000 individuals living in 60% of the nation's 3,141 counties. Data show, however, that residents of nonmetropolitan (rural) counties are far less likely to receive direct services from a CIL than their urban counterparts. CILs reported a median annual budget of $327,691; they allocated 54% of their resources to direct services and 27% to community advocacy. We estimate that an additional $71.5 million will be needed to achieve universal access to CIL services. Results are discussed in terms of the rural population of people with disabilities as representing a traditionally underserved group, and the need to expand CIL services to provide more equitable access for currently unserved and underserved U.S. populations.

Journal of Disability Policy Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 207-224 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/104420730001000205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?